Greek
system would provide social opportunities for students outside living-learning
community
By Tom Cronin - Public Affairs
Reporter
In my 16 months as a Journal
reporter, I’ve noticed that certain campus-related themes tend to
recur when I interview members of the UIS administration. Of these themes,
the one that seems to be the most overarching is the major transformation
that has been taking place at UIS over the past several years.
Student Government Association members are currently considering an initiative
that would mark the greatest transformation to student life since the
introduction of the Capital Scholars Program. As part of their examination
of the pros and cons of Greek life at UIS, the SGA Greek Life Committee
published in last week’s Journal the first of a four-part series
of opinion pieces presenting opposing viewpoints about different aspects
of Greek life.
Last week’s set of opinion pieces offered some helpful insights
concerning the debate over whether social Greek organizations at any given
campus are positive or negative, especially when it comes to academic
performance. I have little doubt that the piece in this week’s issue
and those in the next two issues will explore additional aspects of the
debate, including the difference between a possible Greek system at UIS
and those currently existing at other campuses.
But after noting that both of them made references to the Greek system
at the Urbana-Champaign campus in last week’s pieces, I decided
to weigh in. Although the Greek Life Committee will most likely fully
consider the differences between the potential impact of a Greek system
at UIS and the impact of Greek systems elsewhere, I don’t think
that enough can be said about these differences.
When it comes to Greek systems, one of the most important issues to consider
in terms of impact on student life is campus size. Compared with their
counterparts on large campuses, students living on small campus tend to
have fewer opportunities for campus involvement, often resulting in a
more prominent role for the Greek system.
For four years, I lived on such a campus – Drake University in Des
Moines, Iowa. My social life during these years was strongly influenced
by my decision not to participate in Greek rush. For students who did
participate in rush, their social lives were equally influenced by which
fraternity or sorority houses sent them bids – if they received
any – and by the bid that they accepted.
It was rare to find a member of a fraternity or sorority at Drake who
did not describe their experience with the Greek system as positive. For
non-Greeks – or “GDIs” as they were called in some circles
– feelings about the Greek system as it related to their social
lives were somewhat negative.
The negativity expressed by some non-Greeks stemmed from the fact that
the Greek system divided the campus from a social standpoint. The bonds
between fraternity brothers and sorority sisters and their affinity for
the Greek system in general were so strong that some members avoided interacting
with non-Greeks whenever possible. Some events sponsored by fraternity
and sorority houses were understandably closed to non-Greeks, but even
so-called open fraternity parties were off limits to individuals who were
“blacklisted.”
Although Greek systems tend to divide college campuses – especially
small college campuses – in terms of social life, a Greek system
at UIS would not divide the campus in the way that it divides the typical
small campus. Part of the reason for this is that the campus is already
divided between Capital Scholars and non-Capital Scholars.
The CAP Program and social Greek-letter organizations are obviously different
in a number of fundamental ways, but there are some similarities between
the two entities that should not be ignored when weighing the impact of
a Greek system at UIS. Perhaps the most obvious similarity is that both
CAP Scholars and members of social Greek-letter organizations live together.
As a result of this and other factors, they tend to socialize with one
another more than they do with students outside of their respective entities.
Like members of Greek-letter organizations, CAP Scholars also tend to
dominate campus life. During my senior year at Drake, 18 of 20 student
senators were Greek. Currently, 10 of 13 UIS SGA members are CAP Scholars.
CAP Scholars are sometimes criticized for creating an elitist divide between
themselves and other students, but the fact of the matter is that the
CAP Program has brought changes to campus that have benefited everyone,
especially transfer and graduate students living on campus. The student
body may be more divided than it was four years ago, but all students
have more opportunities to get involved on campus than ever before.
A Greek system at UIS would add to the student-life enhancements that
came about because of the CAP Program without significantly increasing
the size of the student body. If it follows national trends, a UIS Greek
system would involve more students in campus organizations and the community.
Although it would inevitably divide the student body to some extent, a
Greek system would also have the potential to bring students together.
Beginning in fall 2006, the CAP Program will consist of two tracks: an
honors program with a living-learning community and the interdisciplinary
curriculum that are part of the current CAP Program, and a more traditional
four-year program with a general education curriculum.
The general education CAP Scholars probably won’t be as close to
one another as the honors CAP Scholars or the current CAP Scholars because
they won’t be part of the CAP living-learning community. As a result,
the general education CAP Scholars will have a greater need to develop
close social relationships. A Greek system would not only allow them to
form these relationships, but it would also give them the opportunity
to become fraternity brothers and sorority sisters with transfer students,
other general education CAP Scholars and perhaps some honors CAP Scholars.
In other words, a Greek program could very well end up uniting the campus
more than it would divide it, but its success at uniting students would
depend largely on the administration’s ability to attract chapters
interested in recruiting students who don’t all fit into the same
mold.
A
bad case of “meh.”
By
Carly Hawkins - Columnist
I blame February.
Every year around this time, things just get boring. If you’re not
slogging through snow, you’re slogging through a mountain of homework.
Even the warm snap that allowed for flip-flop wearing wasn’t enough
to spice up the doldrums of the semester and the season.
John Negroponte leaving his Ambassadorship to Iraq in favor of becoming
the first intelligence czar? Meh. I’ve gotta say, I’m really
just glad that he’s no longer going to be involved with yet another
country that appears to be rampant with human rights abuses. He never
should have been sent to Iraq in the first place, he’s so inappropriate
for that job. Does having Bush loyalists in positions of power even make
an impact anymore? Are there any other kind of people in the inner circle
of presidential advisors?
The new Secretary of Education, Margaret Spelling, condemns a segment
from the PBS children’s show “Postcards from Buster”
that featured a visit with a family consisting of two mothers. Meh. Are
we really living in a country where airing a segment on diversity has
become a form of peaceful protest by some stations?
The Bush Administration has shady ties to paying off columnists and giving
permanent press passes to ambiguously associated writers. Meh. Is this
supposed to be surprising now?
“There is no First Amendment protection” for the journalists
involved in the Valerie Plame case.
Virginia Tech beat Duke and Texas Tech beat Kansas.
Howard Dean finally, finally got elected to the chairmanship of the Democratic
Party.
The NHL cancelled the remainder of its season.
Meh, double meh, meh and meh again.
The only bright spot in my entire week thus far (well, okay, Virginia
Tech beating Duke was pretty sweet, don’t get me wrong), the only
thing that made me sit up and say something other than “meh”
was an article in the Chicago Sun-Times about the ideological differences
between black and white Evangelical Christians. (It was entitled “One
faith, one Bible – but two races,” from the edition on the
14th if you want to read it yourself.)
In it, Rev. James Meeks of the Salem Baptist Church on Chicago’s
South Side (and also an independent State Senator) says the following:
"Our church's social agenda and the social agenda of the white evangelical
church is totally different. It seems as if the flaw in the white evangelical
church is that it will fight tooth and nail to protect an unborn child
in the womb, but won't lift a finger to assist a child once it's been
born. Where is the [white] evangelical church on issues outside of abortion
and outside of homosexuality?"
And at that point, I said “Amen.”
Rev. Meeks has an extremely valid point, and one that I hope Dr. Dean
and the new leadership of the Democratic Party are absorbing. It’s
clear after the last election that Democrats can no longer function in
reactionary mode. We can’t afford to let the Republican Party define
the issues and then work all of them to their advantage. We have a point,
too. But we somehow have to figure out how to get out from behind this
image of moral-free, snobby hedonism that the GOP has been extremely successful
in pinning on us.
A case study: a couple of weeks ago someone called me a liberal like it
was the worst thing they could ever say about me as a person.
I think the Rev. Meeks’s quote is the direction, politically, that
the Democratic Party should be moving in. We have a rare opportunity at
this point in our history to drastically redefine what we stand for and
the way in which we do so. It is an opportunity that should not be wasted.
Maybe by the time March rolls around I’ll be up to it myself.
Discussion
of the feasibility of Greek life on campus
The Greek
Life Committee, a subcommittee of the SGA, is charged with exploring
the potential, both negative and positive, impact of Greek letter
organizations on the UIS campus community. The following represents
the second in a four part series, where members of the committee examine
the pros and cons of various aspects of Greek Life. After the guest
commentaries have been presented, the committee will develop a survey
to be held concurrent with spring SGA elections, to assess the student
body's sentiments regarding Greek Life at UIS, after which the committee
will report to the SGA and campus administrators with their findings
and recommendations.
PRO
The myth of fraternities
and sororities acting solely as facilitators for cliques is currently
being dispelled. Greek life works as a melting pot to bring people
together across age groups, races and international cultures. Fraternities
and sororities provide an opportunity for students in the university
setting to network and make lasting friendships with fellow students.
There are a plethora of types of fraternal organizations. On any
given campus there is the opportunity for Greek life that can accommodate
to the needs of the students and campus community as a whole. These
organizations can be philanthropic, social, national or local. The
variety of Greek organizations that are available provides an opportunity
for many students to become involved in programming events, charity
work, and various other constructive activities.
Fraternities and sororities are acclaimed for providing a sense
of belonging to students. Many young college students find it hard
to discover their place within their peers. It is very apparent
that retention rates decrease when students do not find a positive
social atmosphere and entertaining nightlife at their university.
As UIS grows, we need to provide more opportunities for campus involvement.
However, we are in a unique position as we can invite Greek organizations
that will work well with our student body population.
For a campus such as UIS, Greek life will be a step forward in efforts
to bring the community together. Fraternities and sororities give
students a sense of identifying who they are and what they would
like to achieve. We would hope that Greek organizations would provide
an even more diversified campus by providing a variety of options
available for students to connect within the campus community. Greek
organizations could give students a strong and real sense of inclusion
during their years at UIS.
CON
UIS is not the standard
university. Our demographics are primarily divided along lines of
age. We have students who show up for one night a week, then leave
and give little thought to anything else. We also have full-time
students who live on campus and are heavily involved in activities
on campus. And somewhere in between we have a multitude of students
along this spectrum.
Greek organizations may help to increase diversity on campus, but
there are concerns to consider with this perceived diversity. While
the organizations will bring diversity, they will also bring exclusivity
as they evolve into cliques. Suddenly our diversity has become a
source of division, which leads into issues related to the myriad
of demographics represented at UIS.
UIS does not have a singular contiguous identity. We already find
ourselves segregated by age, ethnicity, academic program and level
of involvement within the institution. Why add another layer of
division? We must consider that student life on this campus is propelled
by a small but dedicated staff and around 100 highly involved students.
Why commit resources and time to organizations that may steal away
students from those groups that have formed the traditions on this
campus?
What kind of impact could Greek organizations have on our campus’s
identity? Very few people really identify with UIS as an experience.
It is preposterous to think that adding Greek organizations to a
school that lacks a central identity in the first place will truly
benefit the school, let alone enhance the experience. We need to
guard against diluting and dividing our already fragmented student
body by bringing additional organizations, which are largely exclusive.
When students graduate they should be proud and think fondly of
UIS, the institution as a whole, not just their time in an organization
designated by a few Greek letters.
Comic
Counselor's
Corner: The dangers of obsession with weight
By Sarah Triplett - Guest Commentary
Ever find yourself obsessing
over a part of your body that you feel does not meet society’s standards,
say your arms, your stomach, or your ears? You may have issues with your
body image, which can range from very serious to minor obsessions.
The problem with body image for most young people today is that society
sets such a high expectation as to what the standard of beauty is. What
is real though? What we see in magazines, or what we see everyday on the
streets, in class, or out downtown?
The reality is that society does not fit into a magazine, and what’s
sad is that many men and women find themselves being tricked by the images
they flip through or see on TV and in the movies. People who have poor
body image may suffer from low self-esteem, poor confidence, depression,
anxiety and even eating disorders.
Some obsess over what they want to change and become fixated on what they
can scrape off, remold, or suck out. In fact, in 2003, 6.6 million people
in the United States had cosmetic plastic surgery, and over 85 percent
of them were women.
Women take the brunt of what society wants them to look like and they
fall into this trap, often falling so far down the rabbit hole that they
put themselves in danger of jeopardizing their physical and mental well
being.
These obsessions with weight and image can often manifest into an eating
disorder, which is a serious problem and is not to be taken lightly. Some
signs of eating disorders are dramatic weight loss, wearing baggy clothing
to hide weight loss, skipping meals, dryness or redness of knuckles, hair
loss, insomnia, obsessive exercising, frequent trips to the bathroom immediately
following meals, and/or visible food restriction.
If you feel that you or a friend may be developing disordered eating,
help is out there. February is Eating Disorders Awareness Month and it’s
the time to look at you and realize that we all should love our bodies
no matter what.
The National Eating Disorders Association would like to spread the word
on eating disorders and utilize this spotlight to get information out
there. There are serious consequences to eating disorders, like depression,
anxiety, suicide and death from physical complications. Don’t waste
time, if you have a problem or know someone who does, get help. The UIS
Counseling Center is open on campus to help you. Call 206-7122 or stop
by SAB 30.