Bush
proposal would divert GEAR UP funding to new initiative
Springfield
GEAR UP project in last year, would not be affected
By
Tom Cronin - Public Affairs Reporter
A federal program made up of
local partnerships designed to help low-income high school students prepare
for college would lose all federal funding under President George W. Bush’s
fiscal year 2006 budget proposal, but the proposal would not affect a
local project affiliated with the program because the project is in its
last year.
According to a summary of the budget proposal on the U.S. Department of
Education’s Web site, $306.5 million in federal funding to the Gaining
Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs initiative would
be reallocated to help fund a new $1.5 billion High School Initiative
and several projects associated with the No Child Left Behind Act. Larry
Stonecipher, dean of the College of Education and Human Services, said
in an e-mail message to The Journal that the Springfield Public Schools
Partnership began a GEAR UP project in 1999 that targeted a cohort of
low-income seventh graders at Washington Middle School. The partnership
still offers the services of the project to these students, who are now
seniors at Lanphier High School.
Involved in the Springfield GEAR UP partnership are UIS, Lincoln Land
Community College, Springfield School District 186 and the Springfield
Urban League.
At press conference held on Feb. 1 at UIS, the SBC Foundation awarded
the Springfield Partnership two $50,000 to support GEAR UP programs. The
first grant was designed to help enhance teaching and learning through
instructional technologies at Lanphier High School. The second grant aimed
to fund after-school and summer academic enrichment programs in math,
science, reading and technological literacy at the high school.
Stonecipher said that the partnership has received the funds and will
use them during the 2005 calendar year. Although the current GEAR UP project
will end following the completion of the academic year, Stonecipher said
that partnership members have been discussing strategies “to sustain
the successful components of the original GEAR UP grant at Lanipher and
possible expansion into Franklin Middle School and Southeast High School.”
The partnership would need support from the community and the Springfield
Chamber of Commerce to successfully implement the GEAR UP components,
he said.
“We’ve certainly stepped back and taken a look at this, and
said, ‘What have we learned as a result of this partnership?’”
said Sue Dole, deputy superintendent of Springfield School District 186.
“… What we’ve learned is that if we do start talking
to students very early on about their expectations [for the future], that
can make a difference, and that students and their families who really
haven’t thought about a variety of options are now thinking about
them.”
Of the cohort of Lanphier High School seniors currently served by GEAR
UP, over 55 percent have applied to college, Stonecipher said. Last year,
only 12 percent of these students applied to college.
The summary of the budget proposal on the Department of Education’s
Web site said that the administration’s new High School Intervention
Initiative would provide a more comprehensive approach to improving high
school education and increasing student achievement than GEAR UP. The
summary also stated that data were not available to measure progress toward
the long-term goals of GEAR UP.
Stonecipher said that he hopes the proposed initiative, if implemented,
would satisfactorily make up for the elimination of GEAR UP funding, but
he said it was discouraging to see that a program that has shown signs
of success is being proposed for elimination in the future.
SGA
decides spring election timeline, selects new representative
By
Jason Satek - SGA/General Assignment
The
Student Government Association held its latest meeting Sunday night, beginning
the session with nine members present and achieving a voting quorum before
the addition of a tenth member minutes into preliminary business.
President Tyson Roan began Standing Committee reports by outlining three
possible scenarios for a spring election timeline to determine the SGA
for the next year. Taking into account the ramifications of the nearness
of the elections, Roan proposed that the current SGA dedicate their next
scheduled meeting (March 6) largely to the business of solidifying Constitutional
bylaws and begin an hour earlier than normal to ensure it receives the
required time.
Secondly, Roan spoke about the student representative/Illinois Board of
Higher Education meeting to be held on this campus on Feb. 24 at 12 p.m.
The stated purpose of the gathering is to unify Illinois schools in their
efforts to collectively lobby against rising costs, with Roan encouraging
the representatives to attend and spread the word among other students.
The report of the Budget Review Committee was given by Treasurer Jason
Kennedy, who stated that the monies spent to this point were less than
half of the total budget, in accordance with the plan to have a larger
amount available for spring activities.
Under Special Committee reports, Kennedy spoke again about the actions
of the Greek Life Committee in regards to its efforts to generate a school
debate on the possible inclusion of the social organizations and to what
degree it might be fostered.
This “educational phase” of debate will feature upcoming articles
examining the diversity of organizations, their relation to alcohol and
drug abuse, and the feasibility of inclusion. A student survey will follow
afterwards to measure campus attitudes and those results will be put together
into a SGA report to aid in the decision-making.
The agenda was then rearranged to facilitate pressing business, as two
students were present, hoping to fill the Representative at Large position
vacated at the last meeting. Jáhnette Coleman and Kevin Parker
both presented short biographical histories of themselves and then answered
questions by the members. A motion to close the session and debate who
would be chosen carried, and the chamber was emptied.
Thirty-one minutes later, the session was reconvened. The decision was
made more difficult by the fact that Representative from Liberal Arts
& SciencesAshkat Agarwal had sent his resignation in earlier this
month, and upon its acceptance, there were in fact two positions open,
but only one was an “At Large” slot and neither of the prospective
members were from the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences. Determined
to maintain the spirit of diversity of university representation, it was
determined that only the At Large position could be filled, and that Jáhnette
Coleman had been chosen.
Roan praised Parker as an “excellent candidate,” noting his
involvement on campus and encouraged him to run in the upcoming elections
as proof of his caliber and worthiness for office. Coleman was then confirmed
and joined the proceedings.
The three election timetables were brought up for consideration under
new business, and after some debate, the second of the options was passed
by motion. The timeline accepted is as follows: March 21- Applications
for Executive Officers Available, April 3- Applications due, mandatory
candidate meeting, campaigning begins, April 13 & 14- SGA elections,
April 15- Results Announced.
Assistant Dean of Students Jim Korte advised the SGA that the tabulation
of the vote totals might be subject to availability of university resources
and a proposal was put forth by Representative Liz Moran to have applications
be available via the internet, if possible, to facilitate involvement.
Motions to grant funds for the Alumni Association Etiquette Dinner, the
IBHE meeting, and the Conference of Student Government Associations school
exchange passed, and the meeting adjourned.