February 11th

 

Wrong Answer

Scott Shelby

On Monday of this week, I received the following email in my campus account regarding my column published in the January 28 edition of The Journal:

“I hope that you and your wife travel to France... your anti American views would fit in well there... or If we are lucky they will put you and your terrorist wife in jail"

It was immediately obvious that the anonymous writer, who provided a fictitious return email address, had missed the point of the commentary he/she/it was criticizing.  This individual lacks the courage of their convictions and obviously did not find the column so offensive that it called for a thoughtful and well-crafted reply.  The factual errors and poor grammar and punctuation, quite apart from the pejorative tone, should be an embarrassment to the cowardly author.

I call him a coward, lacking courage, because I know what courage is.  The furtive correspondent probably does not know that I am a veteran of four years of active duty service in the United States Marine Corps.  The last thing I am is un-American!  I fought for this country and her colors, and I lost good friends under fire in some of the most hellish places on earth.  My disagreement with the doctrine of pre-emptive warfare is based on an intimate acquaintance with the costs of so-called low-intensity warfare.  I criticize the PATRIOT Act because of the precedent that law quite un-constitutionally sets.  I swore an oath to defend that Constitution, and I uphold that oath by criticizing any law, organization, or person who threatens it. 

The writer (I use the term loosely) erred first when the email was addressed to my personal campus email account rather than to The Journal.  Space for letters to the Editor is given priority when such letters are received, and this space provides a forum for reasoned discourse.  Second, he called my fiancé a terrorist, but she has never been a member of any terrorist organization, she has lived in this country since she was eight years old, and, as the column made quite clear, is distantly related to someone (whom she has never met) who the Israeli government considers a terrorist.  Terrorist is a term that, when misapplied, dehumanizes its object as the term Communist did in the Fifties.  Surely no one feels sorry for terrorists, do they?  And the problem with the PATRIOT Act is the lack of due process for those who have been identified as terrorists on what are sometimes very flimsy grounds, so virtually anyone can be denied constitutional rights.

I do intend to visit France, with my fiancé, as soon as we can afford it.  Perhaps this individual would be willing to foot the bill?  France was instrumental in helping the infant United States defeat the British monarchy, and has a long tradition of democracy through dissent.  French museums house some of the great treasures of Western culture.  Good wine is inexpensive there, and, not inconsequentially, I hear Paris is beautiful in the spring.  But we do not intend to stay.

The United States will remain our home precisely because of the fact that this is a country to which a young man from Ramallah or from anywhere else can come and build a life for himself and his children.  Maybe someday this will be a country where, as Dr. King said, “our children will be judged on the content of their character”.  As the anonymous email pointedly made clear, we are not there yet.  And we cannot get there by abandoning the Constitution under duress.  Ben Franklin said, “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”  Liberty is a privilege to be earned, and sometimes this means taking risks.  I have earned my right to disagree with my government, and I will continue to do so publicly when appropriate, regardless of hate mail from cowards.


Love and Sports? It’s What Dreams Are Made Of

Mark Brockett

As we reflect upon the tradition of Valentine’s Day, I look at the sports world (as I always do), to find meaning. In these eyes, sports can be involved in all aspects of life. But love? Sports? Together? This would take some serious thinking. Lucky you, I have found the three movies that involve sports and specific versions of love.

The love of the sport and the desire to never give up is best displayed in “Rudy”. Love can resurrect an athlete’s career and his life, much like in the movie “Tin Cup”. And, love can coincide with the biggest opportunity that someone may ever get in the Academy Award winning “Rocky”.

Daniel “Rudy” Ruettiger, former football player for the University of Notre Dame, defied all the odds that faced him all of his life. He was considered too small, too average, and too unrealistic to be the success that he longed to be.

The man dreamed of playing for the Fighting Irish since he was a small child and all he ever got from his most of his family, friends, and teachers was complete skepticism. He believed that if he really wanted to go to Notre Dame and play on the same field as his former childhood heroes, he could do it.

His love for the game and the university brought out the toughness and desire that many did notice throughout his life. Most respected it, while others were jealous of it.

Despite the death of his best friend, the criticism of his brother, the reluctance of his high school teacher, and the lack of support from his father, Rudy persevered through it all. His love was blind and it needed to be.

The realization of his dream came when he ran out on the field from the tunnel, but he received more than he could ever have imagined. He played one defensive play and recorded a sack and was carried off the field. The significance of that is that no other player in Notre Dame history has been carried off the field since.

The movie portrays the love that one man has for something while, at the same time, making you fall in love with the story.

Roy McCavoy (played by Kevin Costner) was a man that was stuck in a rut.

Living in a Winnebago and running a run down driving range in Salame, Texas, Roy was looking as if he could never find a way out. Roy was one of the best young golfers that Texas had ever seen.

 His problems lied in the fact that he always strived for perfection and the big prize. He never made the Professional ranks as his style of play always came back to haunt him. This was evident too in the way he lived his life.

One day, he teaches a golf lesson to a suave, sexy Dr. Molly Griswold (played by Rene Russo, a sports movie regular). This happened to be the love interest of his long time rival and former friend David Simms (Don Johnson). Simms was the polar opposite of Roy as he played the conservative way in both golf and life.

Roy and Molly can eventually see that they are meant for each other but Molly resists the temptation as Roy is not the prototypical man she can see herself with. Roy, in spite of this and in the failures of his life, decides to qualify for the U.S. Open. He does and eventually starts to find out that he may need to change his life to be successful. He goes to the Open and performs terribly the first day and begins to question his quest.

However, Molly finds that her prince charming is nothing more than a frog with a crown on the inside and declares her love for Roy. Roy makes a miraculous run the next three rounds and is in contention to win the whole tournament. But, Roy stares at immortality right in the face. A seemingly impossible par 5 on the 18th hole makes Roy salivate. He wasn’t able to resist the temptation to knock it on the green in 2. Roy knocks it in the water 5 straight times by reusing to take a drop. On his last ball, he knocks it on and even in the whole and unknowingly achieves the immortality that he has longed for his whole life.

The adage was that nobody may remember who won this tournament, but that they’d remember his 12 on a par 5. The love he found in himself and in the game shows that even the most desperate souls can be saved.

Finally, we come to Rocky Balboa, the street thug from Philadelphia. One of the greatest stories ever told on the big screen.

Being a low rated boxer who works part time as a collector and lives alone, Rocky is as down as a man can be. He finds a woman that he feels connected to somehow, Adrian. She is a shy, yet intelligent pet shop worker.

What makes them so connected is that they both see each other in ways that nobody else does. He sees her as the smart and strong woman that she desires to be and she sees him as the good hearted individual and fighter that he really is.

Coincidentally, he receives a million to one shot at the same time this takes place. Apollo Creed, the heavyweight champion of the world, offers him a title shot. Rocky takes the shot and, suddenly, becomes Philadelphia’s golden boy. He starts to find people interested in his life, but the higher ups see him as only a puppet in a marketing stunt. Nobody thinks he can win the fight.

Rocky trains and trains in ways that can make even the laziest person energetic. Around the time of the fight, Rocky tries to find meaning in this opportunity that he has been given. He comes to the realization that in order to be happy in his life and in this situation is to go the distance and to not give up, no matter what. He then goes on with the support o f Adrian and does go the distance with Creed, much to the chagrin of the entire world. As the match ends, Rocky earns the respect of his opponent and is looking only for the loving eyes of Adrian who makes a dramatic run to the ring and professes her love for him.  What really is taken out of this movie is the love of another can influence all other facets of life.

That theme runs true even outside of the sports world. Any person can benefit from love, whether it is from a social aspect or a family aspect. The reflection of love can not just be shown on just one day. There are 364 other days to display it, too.


HRC to host Anti-Valentine’s Day Event

Chris Wyant

   After a long process of internal organization, the Housing Residents’ Council has elected a new executive board and is well on its way to planning numerous spring semester events for campus housing residents. 

   From 8:00 to 11:00 pm on February 14th the HRC will host its first event of the semester, an Anti-Valentines Day Program called “Cupid is Stupid,” in the Homer L. Butler Housing Commons. 

   Residents are invited to come at 8:00 PM to bake cookies in the kitchen facilities at the Commons.  HRC will provide all supplies, including black frosting and other “anti-valentine” decorations.  At 9:00 PM a horror movie will be shown in the TV Room.  HRC is also designing other fun games for the evening, such as a UIS version of “Singled Out.”  The event should last until around 11:00 and is open to all campus housing residents.

   The Housing Residents’ Council is the largest organization on campus, its roster consisting of everyone that lives in campus housing.  We would like to formally invite all residents to take a more active role in the organization and help plan programming for all residents.  The Council strives to design new events that appeal to the wide-range of ages and interests on campus.  Any new opinions are always welcome. 

   The council also serves as a means for residents to criticize or applaud housing and its policies.  The board frequently makes formal recommendations to the Housing Office. 

   The next HRC meeting will be in the Butler Housing Commons at 5:00 on Sunday, February 15th.  Other events planned for the spring semester are a “Games Night” on February 28th, and the 2nd annual “Cabin Fever Games,” tentatively scheduled for March 27th

   Take advantage of this great opportunity and get involved in HRC.  For more information on the organization, contact either of its co-chairs:  Jen Davis (jdavi11s@uis.edu) or Chris Wyant (cwyan01s@uis.edu).


Lincoln In Love

BY TYSON ROAN 

   Tomorrow, February 12, people across the world will celebrate the birthday of this nation’s greatest President, the great emancipator, Abraham Lincoln.  Most can recite at least a portion of his Gettysburg address, and surely no one is ignorant of the great role that the man who called Springfield his home served in uniting a nation in the Civil War.  But in light of the Valentine’s Day issue, what do you know of his love life? 

  The early years of Abraham Lincoln and Mary Todd’s relationship paint an antebellum picture of romance, fortune, intrigue, and destiny where love ultimately triumphed over all.  Taken in great part from Ruth Painter Randall’s The Courtship of Mr. Lincoln, what follows is an account of brutal sacrifice, chivalric duels, longing letters and secret encounters, all suffered in the painstaking and ever enduring name of love. 

 

DESTINY

   Early interactions between Abraham and Mary, or ‘Molly,’ as he affectionately referred to her, note Abraham hypnotized by Mary, “charmed with Mary’s wit and fascinated with her quick sagacity—her will, her nature, and culture.” 

   Mary Todd, a Springfield socialite who frequently entertained Springfield’s elite in the Edward’s home, had dated Lincoln’s political adversary, Stephen Douglas, and when asked whether she would marry Douglas or Lincoln, she quipped that she would marry “Him who has the best prospects of being President.” 

   A fortune-teller, she claimed, once told her that she would marry the President, and meeting Lincoln seems not mere coincidence, but rather the birth of a long and hard fought destiny.

   During long strolls in the Springfield prairies and social gatherings at the Edwards’ home, Abraham and Mary’s love for one another grew, and the two were engaged in the late 1830s. 

 

THE SPLIT

    In that day, a father’s blessing was crucial if a man wanted to take into matrimony a woman of Mary’s social stature.  Lincoln consulted Ninian Edwards, Mary Todd’s brother-in-law and guardian, to get his blessing.  Lincoln knew that Edwards had strong aristocratic notions, and while Lincoln was a humble, rugged lawyer struggling to get by, Mary came from a wealthy, Victorian family. 

   On New Year’s Day, 1841, Mary’s pillow was found stained with tears.  It appeared the wedding had been called off.   While’s its unclear exactly why the two broke up, Lincoln said that it was because he had so little to offer a wife.  In other words, Edwards had refused to let the wedding proceed. 

  Dying with love, Lincoln wrote during this time, “I am now the most miserable man living.  If what I feel were equally distributed to the whole human family, there would not be one cheerful face on earth.  Whether I shall ever be any better I can not tell; I awfully forebode I shall not.  To remain as I am is impossible; I must die or be better, it appears to me.” 

   Lincoln locked himself away for an entire a month.  Just as he was not in control of falling in love with Mary Todd, he appeared unable to reason himself out of it. 

  At the Edward’s parlor, refusing to go against her guardian’s will, Lincoln implored Mary to send him a letter releasing him from the engagement.  During this woeful encounter, Mary burst into tears and jumped at Lincoln, crying, “… the deceiver shall be the deceived wo is me.”  Lincoln took Mary into his lap and caressed her in his arms, kissing away her tears. 

  In her letter releasing Lincoln from the engagement, Mary wrote that her feelings for him remained unchanged and she stood ready to renew the engagement at any time. While the marriage was over, the love between the two remained undying. 

   Lincoln submerged himself in law and was very grateful when the spring circuit came around and allowed him to travel to the regional courthouses.  Lincoln said that he had never been so happy in his life to leave Springfield. 

   His broken heart slowly mended, and he developed a passion for a life not yet lived.  In a letter to a dear friend, Lincoln wrote “Whatever he designs, he will do for me yet.  ‘Stand still and see the salvation of the Lord’ is my text just now.” 

 

SECRET MEETINGS

   His salvation came after eighteen months apart from Mary.  Simeon Francis, wife to the editor of the Sangamo Journal and long-time friend of both Lincoln and Mary, hatched out a scheme to bring the two together.  She invited each to her home, and, after longing for one another for over a year, the lovers were once again united. 

   Mrs. Francis insisted that the secret meetings between Mary and Abraham continue, and that Mary Todd’s guardians could know nothing of the matter. 

   In a time before instant messaging, e-mailing, or even the telephone for that matter, the two exchanged letters through an intricate system of trustworthy friends.  The meetings between Mary and Abraham continued in Mrs. Francis’ home.  Mrs. Francis, Abraham, and Mary frequently wrote letters for the Journal under the pseudonym Rebecca, bashing the state auditor, James Shields, a fighting Irishman trained in swordplay. 

 

BLOODY ISLAND

   By the time these letters were published in the Journal, it appears that Abraham and Mary were again engaged, although at the time Mary would not affirm this to even her closest friends. 

   Two of Mary’s letters in the Journal infuriated Shields to the point that he demanded Mr. Francis give reveal to him the identity of the writer.  When Mr. Lincoln was consulted, he replied, “… say to Shields, that ‘I am responsible.’” 

    When he heard the news, Shields departed immediately to Tremont, Illinois, where Lincoln was riding the circuit.  Shields was prepared for a duel. 

   Lincoln agreed to the duel.  In fact, he demanded it unless Shields rescinded his damaging accusations.  He was prepared to die for what his Molly had written.  He was fighting for his pride; he was fighting for his love. 

   A week later, after negotiations had failed, the two men rode out to Alton and departed for Bloody Island, where the duel was to be had.  Fortunately, reason got the better of the duelers on the battleground and before the time came, the duel was called off. 

 

HOLY MATRIMONY

   The duel undoubtedly brought Mary and Abraham closer together.  Shortly after the incident at Bloody Island, the two made plans to wed. 

   Mary agreed to a simple wedding without financial assistance from her affluent guardians, who still felt that if she wed Lincoln, she would be marrying beneath herself.  She prepared to leave one of the most extravagant mansions in Springfield for a small apartment above a tavern, in love with the caring man that she knew, and sure of the remarkable man that he would become. 

   They set the date for November 4, 1842. 

   When that day came, Lincoln went to one of the ministers in town, met him at his breakfast table, and told him, “I want to get hitched tonight.” 

   He met with Ninian Edwards, Mary’s guardian, and told him of their plans.  Ninian consented, and demanded that Mary be wed in his house. 

   That morning, when Mary broke the news to her sister, Edwards’ wife, she did not take so well to the proposition.  She fired charges at Lincoln, calling him a mere ‘plebeian.’ 

   During their conversation, when Edwards was asked to come up with a wedding cake on such short notice, she said “I guess I will have to send to old Dickey’s for some of his gingerbread and beer.”

   Mary flatly replied, “Well, that will be good enough for plebeians, I suppose.”

   In a matter of hours, the wedding was thrown together, and it turned out to be a beautiful and well-attended affair with a proper wedding cake, uniting a flame that most probably gave the future President the peace of mind necessary to perform the near-impossible task ahead of him. 

 

LOVE IS ETERNAL

   Years later, dealing with mental anguish from the loss of her husband and three of her sons, having lived in the heart of the greatest battle ever fought on this soil, Mary wrote “…the only consolation left me, is the certainty, that each day brings me nearer my loved and lost.”  “I shall not much longer be separated from my idolized husband, who has only ‘Gone before’ and I am certain is fondly watching and waiting for our re-union, nevermore to be separated. 

   Today, in a tomb dedicated to their memory only miles north of this university, those same rings that united the Abraham and his Molly on that hurried November day lie resting close to one another on their bearers.  Engraved in them is the inscription that the two lovers chose.  “LOVE IS ETERNAL.” 


UIS Ski Trip Commentary

Mallory Medved

Well, it’s February again, and time for the annual UIS ski trip.  This year, I had one goal: no injuries.  Last year, on the first day of the trip not only did I run facefirst in to a large orange sign that clearly read “SLOW”, but I also sprained my knee in a nasty fall, putting me out of commission for the rest of the weekend.  Needless to say, I got to know the Ski Patrol very well.

            This was going to be my year, though.  About 28 UIS students made the trip up to the Wisconsin Dells on Friday night.  Wisconsin had received 5-6 inches of snow that day, so the roads were pretty treacherous.  We all made it in one piece, however. 

            Our first skiing day, Saturday, was at Cascade Mountain in Portage, WI.  I was determined to conquer the mountain, starting with the bunny hill.  On my very first ride up on the chair lift, a friend and I got our poles tangled.  In the struggle to get them free, I accidentally smacked myself in the face with my pole, giving me a shiny black eye.  So much for this being the year of no injuries. 

            All in all, it was a beautiful day for skiing.  The weather alternated between flurries and sunshine, and the temperature held steady at about 25 degrees.  I pretty much stuck to the bunny hills all morning, trying to build my confidence and get my “snow legs”, as it were.  By lunchtime, I was the very terror of Schoolmarm Trail, frightening the young and inexperienced alike as I gracefully tore down the hill, making sure to “pie”, that is, turning the tips of my skis inward until they resembled a slice of pie, which slows me down. 

            By the end of the day, we were all beat.  Off to the hot tub!  But we couldn’t be up all night, since there was another long day of skiing ahead. 

            Sunday’s destination was Devil’s Head, in Merrimac.  The weather was cloudy with patchy sunshine and a strong wind.  We started right in skiing intermediate trails.  I was all set to dominate the Green and Blue trails as I had done Saturday, until my friends talked me into going down a Black Diamond- the hardest level of ski trail available.  The confidence I had built up on Cascade’s Schoolmarm and Cottontail trails was somewhat dissipated by The Cauldron’s steep drops.  I managed to make it all the way to the bottom in one piece, though I emitted a blood-curdling scream over the last hill that I’m sure could have been heard by the kids over in the tow rope area.  The whole way down I swore, I almost cried, and I “pie”d so hard I thought I was going to break a hip.  And then I promptly got up and did it again. 

            A few more runs later, my nerves were frayed from the constant strain of trying to keep myself from falling and taking out a few of my fellow skiers.  After a particularly messy fall in which I slid about 20 feet to the sarcastic applause of the nearby resort patrons as they waited in line for the chair lift, I decided to hang up my ski boots for the year and retire to the lodge for some hot cocoa.  And so went my 2004 UIS ski trip.  It wasn’t quite the triumphant return to skiing that I had envisioned, but it was a good time nonetheless…black eye, bruises, mental strain, and all.

 

OPINIONS

 

 

 

 

 

The Journal, UIS, Student Life Building, Room 22, Springfield, IL 62703 :: journal@uis.edu :: (217) 206-NEWS